<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://wiki.midsouthmakers.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AMidsouthMakers_Webcams</id>
	<title>Talk:MidsouthMakers Webcams - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://wiki.midsouthmakers.org/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3AMidsouthMakers_Webcams"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.midsouthmakers.org/index.php?title=Talk:MidsouthMakers_Webcams&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-01T01:22:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.44.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://wiki.midsouthmakers.org/index.php?title=Talk:MidsouthMakers_Webcams&amp;diff=8616&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Trent: Shop Webcam</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://wiki.midsouthmakers.org/index.php?title=Talk:MidsouthMakers_Webcams&amp;diff=8616&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2011-06-23T15:45:00Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Shop Webcam&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Shop Webcam ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Reasons for Shop Cam ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Added security&lt;br /&gt;
** This will benefit Glenn and Jeff too&lt;br /&gt;
** Can tell when unapproved people are using equipment&lt;br /&gt;
* Safety&lt;br /&gt;
* Additional coverage of entire space, helps determine when users are present&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== General Notes ==&lt;br /&gt;
* Ben E. will be checking for conduits and usability of conduit for wiring the camera directly&lt;br /&gt;
* There is currently a system in the shop that is bridged wirelessly to the network&lt;br /&gt;
* [http://www.amazon.com/Schlage-WCE100-Wired-Network-Camera/dp/B002BA5VSI/ref=sr_1_1?s=electronics&amp;amp;ie=UTF8&amp;amp;qid=1308621820&amp;amp;sr=1-1 Proposed camera]&lt;br /&gt;
** Ben E. $15 pledged&lt;br /&gt;
** Dan Hess $15 pledged&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Technicals of Wireless Operation of the Webcam ==&lt;br /&gt;
* A 802.11g wifi network has a theoretical maximum of 54 MBit.  Using TCP (instead of UDP) over a non-line of sight link is going to result in a significant reduction.  Converting MBits to MBytes tells you that the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;theoretical maximum of 802.11g is 6.75 MBytes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; per second. Toss in other nodes into the wireless network and you&amp;#039;ll be lucky to achieve &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;20%&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the theoretical bandwidth, or 1.35 Megabytes per second.&lt;br /&gt;
* A mjpeg stream at 30 frames per second uses approximately 819 Kbytes per second.  In other words, you would need almost the entire link bandwidth for a single camera.  Add two cameras and you&amp;#039;ve over-saturated the link.&lt;br /&gt;
* 640x480&lt;br /&gt;
* A single frame coming off the current IP cameras is in the neighborhood of 40 kb&lt;br /&gt;
* The live streams are only available outside the network to a handful (if that many) and they&amp;#039;re only available INSIDE the network to anyone who&amp;#039;s been smart enough to port scan the place&lt;br /&gt;
* What is the necessary frame rate?  Would 20 or even 10 be acceptable\practical? &lt;br /&gt;
* All current cameras have RJ45 jacks&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Trent</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>